Lifestyle Medicine Analysed – Poorly

An article in the British Journal of General Practice published online, on the 29th April 2021, sets out a mixture of support, disdain and implied ineffectiveness of the role that lifestyle medicine[1] has in the restoration and generation of human health. The direct journal response online allows only for 350 words. A fuller response is found below.

Exemplary medical care or Trojan horse? An analysis of the 'lifestyle medicine' movement

Fishbone diagram; Root cause analysis identifying barriers for optimal

Health and Wellness Market Size To Reach USD 8,945.3 Bn by 2032

JCM, Free Full-Text

Clinical Diagnosis of Probable Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy: Diagnostic Accuracy Meta-Analysis of the Boston Criteria

Lifestyle Medicine: A Brief Review of Its Dramatic Impact on Health and Survival

Frontiers Prioritized Research for the Prevention, Treatment, and Reversal of Chronic Disease: Recommendations From the Lifestyle Medicine Research Summit

Frontiers ASHA-Led Community-Based Groups to Support Control of Hypertension in Rural India Are Feasible and Potentially Scalable

Lifestyle Medicine Analysed - Poorly

Effectiveness, reach, uptake, and feasibility of digital health interventions for adults with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta- analysis of randomised controlled trials - The Lancet Digital Health

Lifestyle Medicine: A Brief Review of Its Dramatic Impact on Health and Survival

International Analysis of Sources and Human Health Risk Associated with Trace Metal Contaminants in Residential Indoor Dust